Every book is a failure :)


. . . I hope to write another [novel] fairly soon.
It is bound to be a failure,
every book is a failure,
but I do know with some clarity
what kind of book I want to write.

– – –

By titling my Whitney recap as I have, I don’t wish to suggest the five books in the General Category sucked. After all, the novel Orwell was planning to write was Nineteen Eighty-four, an enormous success by about every criteria I can imagine (outside cheerfulness—huge bust on the cheerfulness front). Rather, as I revisit the books I’ve read and reviewed, I want to think about what they suggest about us as a writing community in 2014. I’ll cover them in the order they are listed on the Whitney site which, coincidentally, is the same order I ranked them in.

whitney finalists


Love Letters of the Angels of Death by Jennifer Quist

I had a hard time deciding between Quist’s book and Dunster’s for the top spot, but ultimately, Love Letters is the sort of book that deserves to receive rewards. It takes risks and pulls them off; it does something we haven’t seen before; it’s beautiful at the sentence level and moving on the book level; it contains nuggets of wisdom and articulated reality that are quotable without distracting from the thrust of the story. Really, it’s a true work of art and one I will place in anyone’s hands without hesitation. I am still perturbed by the p-o-v switch near the end of the novel (though apparently I’m its only reader to even notice it), but that’s not enough to keep me from giving it my top placing.

Mile 21 by Sarah Dunster

Mile 21 is not not composed of sentences as lovely as seen in Love Letters (largely I think this is an issue of its first-person p-o-v), but it has an exquisite layering of metaphor, and although it’s overall structure seems happy-ending-centric, it manages to arrive at that ending without sacrificing the complexity and ambiguities inherent in each of its character’s arcs. The novel maintains an emotional honesty throughout and never glances away even when the pain is hard to take, and that makes the protagonist’s final redemption all the more powerful.

Road to Bountiful by Donald S. Smurthwaite 

Bountiful loses its way in the middle, could have used a few more plot points, and stumbles a bit at the end, but even in its simplicity of tale and issues with consistency, it ultimately tells truths without mudding about too much in sentimentality and thus I consider it a success.

Ruby’s Secret by Heather B. Moore

This book has more potential than it successfully executed, but it does manage to pull off its cathartic ending and, sentence by sentence, the prose charms and keeps the story moving even through its flaws.

The House at Rose Creek by Jenny Proctor

More ambitious than Ruby’s Secret, I ultimately dropped Rose Creek to last because of its difficulties in managing its various plots and its need for tighter prose. Like Ruby’s Secret and Mile 21 (and, if you squint, the other two novels as well), Rose Creek has a traditionally shaped romance as one of its key elements. However, it couldn’t keep the romance plotline balanced against the other elements of the story, which is a large part of how it ultimately lost its way.

Final thoughts

Sadly, the only other book I read this year which qualifies in this category is The Reluctant Blogger which I would not argue is clearly superior to any of the five books nominated and so, as far as I know, these are in fact the finest five “general” novels from LDS authors published in 2013. The first two I am happy to have among our top five. The other three contain elements I find pleasing (and I will happily give these authors’ work another shot) but aren’t quite strong enough to let me feel delighted in calling them the best we have to offer.

But again: I only read six qualifying novels and so I can’t comment on whether I find issue with what makes the final or with what we are writing.

What I do know is that the Whitneys are getting me to read outside my regular shelves and that has to be a good thing. Sometimes we compartmentalize ourselves as readers and as writers and darn it books want to be free. The more we read, the more writers that join our community of words-to-be-read, the more we approximate Zion. Even if this version of Zion is a zero-sum game that involves saying one book’s better than another.

But whatever. It’s a fallen world. Let’s enjoy what we have and celebrate together.

Best wishes to all, this LDStorymakers weekend!

13 thoughts on “Every book is a failure :)”

  1. I am so nervous to meet lots of people and also excited to meet lots of people. Summaries and reviews like these really help my writing. I appreciate them. Hooray 🙂

  2. How many qualifying novels were published that aren’t part of the 6 you mention? [and by that I mean general fiction novels that would have a shot at a Whitney].

  3. .

    It’s a good question and I’m really not sure how to judge. I rather wish I had read the Romance category so I would have a better sense of why some books were placed here rather than here. (I think my explanation above is correct, but it would be nice to know for sure.)

    I would wager Covenant published at least thrice what was nominated, plus some from Cedar Fort. A few more in the national realm (Elders probably couldn’t win a Whitney and I don’t think I would like it, but it seems like it ought to be on this list).

    So I would guess at least twenty, but certainly much less than fifty (I should go find Andrew’s 2013 rundown…). Given that number, it’s not surprising I’m not impressed by all of them.

    The fact that an unknown-to-the-community book like Quist’s made the finalists though makes me feel pretty good about the process.

  4. .

    Using Andrew for a reasonable likely (and Whitney-friendly) shortlist:

    Songs of Willow Frost by Jamie Ford, a former Whitney winner
    A Step of Faith by Richard Paul Evans. which I’m happy not to have had to read
    A Different Blue by Amy Harmon, which I think would be general
    Making Faces by Amy Harmon
    The Accidental Marriage by Annette Haws

    The DB and Covt sites are difficult to parse by release date, so they’re missing. But since very few of their books are clearly “general” I may have way overshot my estimate.

  5. .

    One of those covers is better than the other…..

    I’ll tell you one thing this little exercise has renewed my irritation that I said sure, romance, instead of insisting Byuck was general. SO MUCH LESS COMPETITION.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s